It is more harmful to compromise one’s own beliefs than to adhere to them.
Whether it is more harmful to compromise one’s own beliefs than to adhere to them can be weighed in many aspects. In some cases, adhering to our beliefs is important, while in other cases, it will happen in the opposite way. In my opinion, I generally do not concur with the statement that compromise necessarily means that it is harmful.
Admittedly, when it comes to religious belief, it is essential to stand on one’s value and defend its position rather than compromise with others. For example, when people offense others’ religion, it is not respectful, and those people should advocate and adhere to their beliefs. However, despite the rare cases, it is not harmful to be compromising.
First of all, we should consider the essence of one’s belief and further assess whether we should give up on it or not. For example, a leader whose ultimate goal is to bring welfare to his citizens has a loft belief in his mind to make the country prosperous, yet, the approach is to develop the nuclear weapons to demonstrate the ability of the scientific and military strength. However, his belief may not be suitable for the general public and cause unnecessary risk. It is more favorable to invest the resource in education, employment rate, and economic activity. Therefore, in this case, a leader will be more harmful if he adheres to his beliefs and disregards the voice of his people.
On the other hand, when it comes to scientific research, adherent will cause stubborn and hamper the progress of the development. For example, in aviation history, the progress of the shape of the wing of aircraft is highly beholden to the biological study, especially bird experts. To build a more efficient wing structure and reduce fuel consumption, aviation engineers devote many times to study and test with experts from other fields. However, if we follow the logic of the statement, those engineers adhere to their beliefs and overlook the traits of birds and suggestions from other experts, there’s no chance that we can relish the fast and convenient air travel. Consequently, compromise can bring many virtues and accelerate the progress of the development in scientific fields.
To sum up, the statement is not as persuasive as it stands. Base on my exposition mentioned above, except in some rare cases, compromise can prevent us from being intransigent and foster the progress in scientific study. Moreover, we should also scrutinize the value of one’s beliefs that whether it is opportune to most people. Therefore, the assertion of compromise will bring harmfulness is not compelling.
Word count: 430
